While
the book is often cited – by myself among others – as a classic true crime
piece, it has always been taken for granted that Capote, hardly a journalist,
took many liberties with the facts. Capote himself called the
work, “a true crime novel,” an oxymoron but his contention nonetheless.
The
new information that has been unearthed by the WSJ shows a true crime problem,
speaking of the genre itself. It casts doubt on just how the apprehension of
one of the suspects went down, and looks at the hero of the book from a
different angle, in which the author favored him in exchange for
cooperation and access.
Drama
makes a book, and yet real life isn’t nearly as dramatic as fiction. If, as the WSJ story says, the culprits
in the 1959 slaying of the Clutters, a Kansas farm family, were apprehended
five days later than Capote claims, and not by Kansas Bureau of Investigation Detective Alvin Dewey Jr., well, that simply confirms one of the “novel” parts of
the book.
The
fact that the KBI refuses to be of any help in unraveling the delay in the
arrest, if there was one, speaks of a newer department with little regard to
its past.
Still,
these are small demerits on the genre, which Capote rode to journalistic stardom.
But I’m not sure that the WSJ findings are all that groundbreaking.
Additionally,
there are some points made in this story that are somewhat off base. It says:
In researching "In Cold
Blood," Truman Capote received first-class service from the KBI and Mr.
Dewey, its lead detective on the case. Mr. Dewey gave the author access to the
diary of 16-year-old Nancy Clutter—her final entry logged only moments before
two strangers invaded her home in late 1959 and murdered her, her brother and
her parents. Mr. Dewey opened the KBI's case file to Mr. Capote. He pressured
press-shy locals to cooperate with the author and granted him extraordinary
access to the killers.
This
is not the first time the relationship between Dewey and Capote has been
scrutinized.
This
piece from 2005 in the Lawrence, Kansas, newspaper also questioned the
book’s treatment of the detective.
All
journalists seek the access Dewey gave Capote, from anyone; family member or
friend of the victim or perp, or law enforcement agent. I’ve been given
terrific access to documents, journals, letters and photos by sources that I
cultivated. Sometimes, when warranted, these people have been cast well in the
story, because the people who tend to be so transparent and helpful are often
the good characters in the seedy world that surrounds any murder. Cops and
criminals, often cast in the same mold, have been equally helpful.
It’s
also pointed out that Capote used his leverage to negotiate an outsized
contract - worth up to $181,000 by
today’s measure – for Dewey’s wife to serve as a consultant in the film version
of the book. Today, such largesse by connection is hardly blinked at.
Additionally,
we live in a pay to play unethical world of journalism.
ABC
paid Casey Anthony $200,000 for photos and video, a breach so sick that no
one should ever believe a word from that dinosaur network. And the WSJ thinks
the Capote gesture, and his relationship with Dewey, was somehow…what?
Then
there’s this:
Mr.
Capote's defenders note that the rules of non-fiction-book writing, including
the footnoting of source material, hardened only after Mr. Capote helped
pioneer the genre.
Not
true, of course. Non-fiction is to be pure fact, not subject self-dictated rules before or after a certain work. Wouldn’t it be ironic of
we could blame In Cold Blood for the
poor reputation of the genre?
Today,
true crime books are marginalized and disparaged, given low-profile space at
“mystery” writing conferences and hidden in bookstores, often among the mystery
fiction.
This
despite the public’s fascination with crime and the explosion of television
shows based on true crimes, as well as reality shows showing the lives of those
who commit crimes.
Crime
and the public’s fascination with both the legal process, the sleuthing and the
acts that prompt it all is at a high point today, mostly because of
availability. Cable TV, Amazon, YouTube, Netflix, the latest case profile is
right there. Fact, fiction or both, Capote’s book was ahead of the game.